In the Matter of Chairez, 26 I&N Dec. 819 (BIA 2016), the BIA followed the Supreme Court’s decision in Mathis v. United States, 136 S.Ct. 2243 (2016) in finding that a criminal statute may only be considered divisible when it contains different elements in the disjunctive that each require jury unanimity in order to sustain a conviction.
BIA Issues New Precedent Decision Regarding Divisibility
- Election Issues and Immigration #7: Studying the Two Mentions of Immigration in the First Presidential Debate
- Texas Attorney General Threatens to Amend DAPA Lawsuit to Include DACA
- Minor Party Candidates Part Two / Election Issues and Immigration #11: Examining the Minor Party Candidates on Immigration
- Matter of Richmond, 26 I&N Dec. 779 (BIA 2016): Analysis of Inadmissibility Provision for False Claim to Citizenship
- Waivers of Inadmissibility for Asylees and Refugees