Home Immigration Blog BALCA Decision on ACWIA Prevailing Wage Determinations

BALCA Decision on ACWIA Prevailing Wage Determinations

The Board of Labor Certification Appeals (BALCA) issued an interesting decision in the Matter of University of Michigan [PDF version].¹ The decision concerned the appeal of an American Competitiveness and Workforce Improvement Act (ACWIA) prevailing wage determination that was part of an H1B petition [see article] by the University of Michigan.

Department of Labor (DOL) regulations found in 20 C.F.R. 656.40(e) [PDF version], which were written to implement Section 415 of ACWIA state that:

In computing the prevailing wage for…an employee of an institution of higher education, or an affiliated or related nonprofit entity, a nonprofit research organization, or a Governmental research organization, the prevailing wage level takes into account the wage levels of employees only at such institutions and organizations in the area of intended employment.²

The University of Michigan provided evidence for the prevailing wage of an H1B petition beneficiary based upon the wages of similarly situated workers at “institutions of higher education.” The Certifying Officer (CO) rejected the University of Michigan’s approach because he argued on the argument that the ACWIA wage must consider all of the ACWIA entities listed in 22 C.F.R. 656.40(e), and not just institutions of higher education.

BALCA determined that the DOL regulations clearly envisioned treating each of the entities listed in ACWIA as separate for prevailing wage determinations.³ Because the DOL was unable to determine prevailing wages for “affiliated or related nonprofit entities and nonprofit research organizations,” it folded them into a category with institutions of higher education. However, the DOL kept separate a universe of institutions of higher education because it was able to make prevailing wage determinations for institutions of higher education.

Because BALCA determined that the DOL regulations only allow for ACWIA wage determinations for institutions of higher education to sample only other institutions of higher education, BALCA rejected the CO’s insistence that the University of Michigan sample each type of ACWIA entity as an abuse of discretion.

Matter of University of Michigan (November 18, 2015), Published on AILA InfoNet Doc. No. 15120104
Using the decision’s sample of the regulation.
Citing: 69 Fed. Reg. at 77326, 77371

Also you can read

Family Based Immigration

Marriage Fraud Old

There are many immigration benefits available to aliens who are married to U.S. citizens. For this reason, aliens in the United States who have accrued at least 180 days of unlawful presence, cannot work due to their lack of status, and face 3 or 10 year or permanent bars of inadmissibility that attach upon departing from the United States, have been known to consider entering into sham marriages solely for the purpose of obtaining immigration benefits.

Fixing Misclassification as a Conditional Permanent Resident

We examine how a permanent resident who was misclassified as a conditional permanent resident by USCIS can fix the error.

SIJ Adjudications After Request for Evidence (RFE)

The USCIS updated its guidance on the 180-day period for adjudicating special immigrant juvenile petitions by removing provisions for tolling the 180-day period.

Want to schedule a consultation?

You can schedule a consultation with us on Skype, over the phone, or in person by using our “Online Consultation” form. Our fee is only $260 per up to 45 minutes for all consultations regardless of the topic.

Contact Information

27 Whitehall Street, 5th Fl New York, NY. 10004

Phone: (212) 202-0342

Fax: (212) 964-0440

Attorney Advertising: prior results do not guarantee similar outcomes.

myattorneyusa.com is owned and operated by The Law Offices of Grinberg & Segal, PLLC (Grinberg & Segal). The content of myattorneyusa.com is copyrighted. Grinberg & Segal is a NYC immigration law firm that consists of highly experienced immigration lawyers licensed to practice state law in New York and New Jersey and U.S. federal law worldwide. Grinberg & Segal’s  New York-based immigration, deportation and removal lawyers represent immigrant clients in all fifty states and before U.S. Consulates anywhere in the world. Grinberg and Segal’s immigration lawyers are highly skilled and experienced in all areas of immigration law and related federal litigation including Writs of Mandamus and Habeas Corpus as well as APA Action in Federal District Courts, Petitions For Review in U.S. Circuit Courts and all administrative appeals Before the Board of Immigration Appeals (BIA) of the Executive Office for Immigration Review; Administrative Appeals Office (AAO) at the U.S. Department of Homeland Security (DHS) as well as before Immigration Courts nationwide.