The Law Offices of Grinberg & Segal, PLLC is an immigration law firm based in New York. Our firm consists of experienced United States immigration lawyers dedicated to assisting individuals and businesses navigate the tangle of United States immigration laws. Our office is located in Manhattan, New York, but we handle immigration matters throughout the United States. Our firm’s objective is to provide you with personalized attention and professional service toward achieving your immigration goals.
DISCLAIMER: Please be advised the results achieved in the cases mentioned below depend upon the exact facts and circumstances of that particular case. It is important to keep in mind that since no two cases are exactly the same, The Law Offices of Grinberg & Segal, PLLC cannot guarantee a specific result in any legal matter. Any results included on our website is based upon actual legal matters and represents the results achieved in that particular matter, and does not constitute a guarantee, warranty, or forecast of the outcome of any other legal matters regardless of how similar your situation may appear.
Outcome: I-140 Immigrant Self-Petition is granted
This is a very interesting case where an extraordinary neurosurgeon as well as business person sought to qualify as possessing extraordinary ability in business while seeking to establish important program here in the USA which is beneficial for the American National Interest as well. The case presented a number of interesting issues including the interplay between extraordinary achievements in medicine as well as in business while relying mostly on the business aspects of the resume.
Outcome: Nonimmigrant Petition is Granted
Case involves an application by a multinational company for the internal transfer of the executive to work at the company's subsidiary in the USA in order to establish a new office here.
Outcome: The DHS joined in the request for the proceedings to be reopened so the judge could grant asylum
Material Support to a Terrorist Organization is a serious finding which if made, would render the individual subject to it ineligible for asylum and adjustment of status. There are some exceptions to this rule which were not previously available. This is one of the cases granted under the exception.
Outcome: Appeal Granted Cases remanded for further proceedings
This case is about the government’s failure to sustain their burden of proof on deportability for an individual who had been convicted of a CIMT. The entire question was about whether the government proved with clear and convincing evidence that the respondent indeed committed that crime within five years after his admission.
Outcome: Appeal Sustained by the BIA
This case involves an asylum applicant from Belarus whom the IJ found lacking credibility based on ostensible discrepancies not supported by the record. The Board of Immigration Appeals disagreed, finding the record not to be developed to support the IJ’s negative credibility finding. The BIA also found that the IJ failed to provide an opportunity to the respondent to rebut the ostensible discrepancies; review ample corroborative evidence submitted by the respondent as well as adequately review the pattern and practice theory of persecution.
You can schedule a consultation with us on Skype, over the phone, or in person by using our “Online Consultation” form. Our fee is only $260 per up to 45 minutes for all consultations regardless of the topic.
