The Law Offices of Grinberg & Segal, PLLC is an immigration law firm based in New York. Our firm consists of experienced United States immigration lawyers dedicated to assisting individuals and businesses navigate the tangle of United States immigration laws. Our office is located in Manhattan, New York, but we handle immigration matters throughout the United States. Our firm’s objective is to provide you with personalized attention and professional service toward achieving your immigration goals.
DISCLAIMER: Please be advised the results achieved in the cases mentioned below depend upon the exact facts and circumstances of that particular case. It is important to keep in mind that since no two cases are exactly the same, The Law Offices of Grinberg & Segal, PLLC cannot guarantee a specific result in any legal matter. Any results included on our website is based upon actual legal matters and represents the results achieved in that particular matter, and does not constitute a guarantee, warranty, or forecast of the outcome of any other legal matters regardless of how similar your situation may appear.
Outcome: Adjustment of Status is granted
The case presented several questions including issues of Domestic Violence; Care for the Children and long immigration history which could potentially lead to discretionary denial. Case was approved.
Outcome: Motion to Reconsider Granted. Denial of the I-140 vacated. I-140 approved.
This is a motion to reconsider made to Administrative Appeals Office and USCIS. The issues in the case involved denial of the I-140 based on inability to pay where the employer was drawing the surplus earnings into his own bonus annually and the surplus exceeded her proposed salary.
Outcome: BIA Granted Appeal
BIA confirmed decision of the immigration judge on a specific issue of criminal law.
Outcome: Removal Proceedings Terminated
Immigration Judge decision on a case remanded by the Board of Immigration Appeals (BIA). The decision comes on my request to terminate removal proceedings due to favorable applicable recent circuit court decisions that changed the law as applied to my client.
Outcome: Appeal Sustained by the BIA
This case involves an asylum applicant from Belarus whom the IJ found lacking credibility based on ostensible discrepancies not supported by the record. The Board of Immigration Appeals disagreed, finding the record not to be developed to support the IJ’s negative credibility finding. The BIA also found that the IJ failed to provide an opportunity to the respondent to rebut the ostensible discrepancies; review ample corroborative evidence submitted by the respondent as well as adequately review the pattern and practice theory of persecution.
You can schedule a consultation with us on Skype, over the phone, or in person by using our “Online Consultation” form. Our fee is only $260 per up to 45 minutes for all consultations regardless of the topic.
