The Matter of Castro-Lopez held that when the 10-year physical presence requirement for NACARA cancellation, it stars with the most recently incurred ground of removal.
The Matter of Y-S-L-C-held that the that testimony in immigration proceedings should be admitted if it is probative and if its admission would be fundamentally fair.
In Godfrey v. Lynch, the 8th Cir. found that an alien who checked on the Form I-9 that he was a citizen or national made a false representation of citizenship.
Matter of C-C- is a precedent BIA decision from 1948 holding that an alien may not be placed in deportation for an overstay when he was prevented from departing.
Aliens at the border inadmissible under certain security and related grounds are subject to summary removal at the discretion of the Attorney General
In this article, we examine how the BIA has applied the circumstance-specific approach from Nijhawan v. Holder to a variety of immigration statutes.
27 Whitehall Street, 5th Fl New York, NY. 10004
Attorney Advertising: prior results do not guarantee similar outcomes.
