Home Immigration Blog Visa Sanctions Imposed Against Cambodia, Eritrea, Guinea, and Sierra Leone

Visa Sanctions Imposed Against Cambodia, Eritrea, Guinea, and Sierra Leone

On September 13, 2017, the Department of Homeland Security (DHS) announced that it had coordinated with the Department of State (DOS) to impose visa sanctions on the following four countries:

Cambodia
Eritrea
Guinea
Sierra Leone

Acting Secretary of Homeland Security Elaine Duke and Secretary of State Rex Tillerson exercised their authority under section 243(d) of the Immigration and Nationality Act (INA) to impose these sanctions for the failure of the four countries to accept the return of their nationals in a reasonable manner. You may read the DHS news release here [PDF version].

The DHS explained that under the decision of the Supreme Court of the United States in Zadvydas v. Davis, 533 U.S. 678 (2001) [PDF version], aliens ordered removed may not, in most circumstances, be detained in excess of six months. In the vast majority of cases, the DHS cannot remove an alien without a travel document issued by the alien’s home country. Accordingly, the effect of the rule in Zadvydas is that the DHS is often forced to release aliens ordered removed when the countries of nationality of the aliens either deny or unreasonably delay their return.

The DHS estimates that due to denials and delays, it has been forced to release 2,137 nationals of Guinea and 831 nationals of Sierra Leone who have been ordered removed. It adds that there are “approximately 700 Eritrean nationals” and “more than 1,900 Cambodian nationals” residing in the United States who are subject to outstanding final orders of removal. Of the over 1,900 such Cambodian nationals, 1,412 have criminal convictions. Many of the nationals who have been ordered removed described in this paragraph have what the DHS describes as “serious criminal convictions.”

The following are the sanctions imposed on each of the four countries under section 243(d) of the INA:

Cambodia: The U.S. Embassy in Phnom Penh, Cambodia discontinued the issuance of B visas for Cambodian Ministry of Foreign Affairs Employees, with the rank of Director General and above, and their families.
Eritrea: The U.S. Embassy in Asmara, Eritrea, has discontinued the issuance of all B visas.
Guinea: The U.S. Embassy in Conakry, Guinea has discontinued the issuance of B, F, J, and M visas to Guinean government officials and their immediate family members.
Sierra Leone: The U.S. Embassy in Freetown, Sierra Leone has discontinued the issuance of B visas to Ministry of Foreign Affairs officials and immigration officials.

The restrictions for Cambodia, Guinea, and Sierra Leone apply only to certain government officials, and are therefore of limited applicability. The restrictions placed on Eritrea are broader, amounting to a general bar on the issuance of B visas, but not on other types of visas.

We discussed the issue in a blog when the news first broke that visa sanctions would be imposed on Cambodia, Eritrea, Guinea, and Sierra Leone [see blog]. There, we noted that the section 243(d) authority had only been used twice prior, and the issue was resolved expeditiously after the imposition of section 243(d) sanctions. The use of section 243(d) against four countries suggests that the Trump Administration is looking to use the immigration laws more aggressively to ensure that foreign countries do not deny or unreasonably delay the return of their nationals who have been ordered to removed. The current set of section 243(d) sanctions are not only worth watching for the resolution of the specific cases, but also in order to see whether the Trump Administration takes a similar approach with other countries that have been determined to be similarly recalcitrant in accepting the return of their nationals who have been ordered removed.

We will update the website with more information as it becomes available. Nationals of Cambodia, Eritrea, Guinea, and Sierra Leone who have questions about how the new policy may affect them should consult with an experienced immigration attorney for guidance.

Also you can read

Family Based Immigration

Marriage Fraud Old

There are many immigration benefits available to aliens who are married to U.S. citizens. For this reason, aliens in the United States who have accrued at least 180 days of unlawful presence, cannot work due to their lack of status, and face 3 or 10 year or permanent bars of inadmissibility that attach upon departing from the United States, have been known to consider entering into sham marriages solely for the purpose of obtaining immigration benefits.

Fixing Misclassification as a Conditional Permanent Resident

We examine how a permanent resident who was misclassified as a conditional permanent resident by USCIS can fix the error.

SIJ Adjudications After Request for Evidence (RFE)

The USCIS updated its guidance on the 180-day period for adjudicating special immigrant juvenile petitions by removing provisions for tolling the 180-day period.

Want to schedule a consultation?

You can schedule a consultation with us on Skype, over the phone, or in person by using our “Online Consultation” form. Our fee is only $260 per up to 45 minutes for all consultations regardless of the topic.

Contact Information

27 Whitehall Street, 5th Fl New York, NY. 10004

Phone: (212) 202-0342

Fax: (212) 964-0440

Attorney Advertising: prior results do not guarantee similar outcomes.

myattorneyusa.com is owned and operated by The Law Offices of Grinberg & Segal, PLLC (Grinberg & Segal). The content of myattorneyusa.com is copyrighted. Grinberg & Segal is a NYC immigration law firm that consists of highly experienced immigration lawyers licensed to practice state law in New York and New Jersey and U.S. federal law worldwide. Grinberg & Segal’s  New York-based immigration, deportation and removal lawyers represent immigrant clients in all fifty states and before U.S. Consulates anywhere in the world. Grinberg and Segal’s immigration lawyers are highly skilled and experienced in all areas of immigration law and related federal litigation including Writs of Mandamus and Habeas Corpus as well as APA Action in Federal District Courts, Petitions For Review in U.S. Circuit Courts and all administrative appeals Before the Board of Immigration Appeals (BIA) of the Executive Office for Immigration Review; Administrative Appeals Office (AAO) at the U.S. Department of Homeland Security (DHS) as well as before Immigration Courts nationwide.