Home Immigration Blog AG to Review Whether Certain Theft or Fraud Convictions Trigger Removal for Aggravated Felony

AG to Review Whether Certain Theft or Fraud Convictions Trigger Removal for Aggravated Felony

Introduction: Matter of Reyes, 27 I&N Dec. 708 (A.G. 2019)

On November 21, 2019, Attorney General William P. Barr published a decision in Matter of Reyes, 27 I&N Dec. 708 (A.G. 2019) [PDF version]. The Attorney General directed the Board to refer Matter of Reyes and a specific issue therein to him for review. In this article, we will examine the Attorney General’s referral.

Referral

The Attorney General directed the Board to refer Matter of Reyes to him for review under 8 CFR 1003.1(h)(1)(i). The Board’s decision in Matter of Reyes is automatically stayed pending the Attorney General’s review. Matter of Reyes is a non-precedent decision.

Issues Presented

The Attorney General invited the parties and interested amici to submit briefs that address the following question:

[W]hether an alien who has been convicted of a criminal offense necessarily has been convicted of an aggravated felony for purposes of [INA 237(a)(2)(A)(iii)], where all of the elements of the underlying statute of conviction, and thus all the means of committing the offense, correspond either to an aggravated felony theft offense, as defined in [INA 101(a)(43)(G)], or to an aggravated felony fraud offense, as defined in [INA 101(a)(43)(M)(i)].

Section 237(a)(2)(A)(iii) provides that any alien who has been convicted of an aggravated felony after admission is deportable. The Attorney General is considering whether an alien who is convicted of violating a statute where all the elements of the statute correspond either to an aggravated felony theft offense (INA 101(a)(43)(G)) or an aggravated felony fraud offense (INA 101(a)(43)(M)(i)) is necessarily deportable under INA 237(a)(2)(A)(iii).

INA 101(a)(43)(G) defines an aggravated felony (in the pertinent part) as “a theft offense (including receipt of stolen property) … for which the term of imprisonment [is] at least one year…”

INA 101(a)(43)(M)(i) defines an aggravated felony as “an offense that involves fraud or deceit in which the loss to the victim or victims exceeds $10,000…”

Briefing Schedule

The parties in Matter of Reyes will be required to submit briefs not exceeding 15,000 words on or before December 20, 2019. Interested amici may submit briefs not exceeding 9,000 words on or before January 17, 2020. The parties may also submit reply briefs not exceeding 6,000 words on or before January 17, 2020.

Conclusion

The Attorney General’s ultimate decision in Matter of Reyes could implicate many removal cases — especially any involving convictions for offenses that are generally described by both INA 101(a)(43)(G) and INA 101(a)(43)(M)(i). Although it is uncertain when the Attorney General will publish a decision, recent Attorney General decisions suggest that a decision could be expected in mid- to late-2020.

Also you can read

Late Appeals of NY Criminal Convictions and Immigration Proceedings

The BIA in Matter of Brathwaite analyzed the finality of a conviction for immigration purposes in the case of a late New York appeal under section 460.30.

JM Acosta and Immigration Definition of “Conviction”

In Matter of JM Acosta, the BIA clarified rules for the finality of criminal convictions for immigration purposes in removal proceedings.

Convictions for Making Terroristic Threats and CIMTs (Matter of Salad)

In Matter of Salad, the BIA examined when a statute for making terroristic threats is a crime involving moral turpitude (CIMTS)

Matter of Obshatko, 27 I&N Dec. 173 (BIA 2017): No Categorical Approach for Removability for Violating Protection Order

In Matter of Obshatko, the BIA held that the categorical and modified categorical approaches don’t apply to INA 237(a)(2)(E)(ii) (violating an order of protection)

Want to schedule a consultation?

You can schedule a consultation with us on Skype, over the phone, or in person by using our “Online Consultation” form. Our fee is only $260 per up to 45 minutes for all consultations regardless of the topic.

Contact Information

27 Whitehall Street, 5th Fl New York, NY. 10004

Phone: (212) 202-0342

Fax: (212) 964-0440

Attorney Advertising: prior results do not guarantee similar outcomes.

myattorneyusa.com is owned and operated by The Law Offices of Grinberg & Segal, PLLC (Grinberg & Segal). The content of myattorneyusa.com is copyrighted. Grinberg & Segal is a NYC immigration law firm that consists of highly experienced immigration lawyers licensed to practice state law in New York and New Jersey and U.S. federal law worldwide. Grinberg & Segal’s  New York-based immigration, deportation and removal lawyers represent immigrant clients in all fifty states and before U.S. Consulates anywhere in the world. Grinberg and Segal’s immigration lawyers are highly skilled and experienced in all areas of immigration law and related federal litigation including Writs of Mandamus and Habeas Corpus as well as APA Action in Federal District Courts, Petitions For Review in U.S. Circuit Courts and all administrative appeals Before the Board of Immigration Appeals (BIA) of the Executive Office for Immigration Review; Administrative Appeals Office (AAO) at the U.S. Department of Homeland Security (DHS) as well as before Immigration Courts nationwide.